This Blog has moved to

False Positives Adventures in Technology, SciFi and Culture from Toronto

Saturday, January 08, 2005

Pro metadata will lose to folksonomy

Via Boing Boing, Clay Shirky comments with a comparison of the advantages of folksonomies vs. "controlled vocabularies". Key points I take from him:

  • Controlled vocabularies are not extensible to the majority of cases where tagging is needed. folksonomies are better than nothing.
  • users pollute controlled vocabularies, by misapplying the words, or stretching them to uses never imagined, or sticking eveything in other.
  • Building, maintaining, and enforcing a controlled vocabulary is, relative to folksonomies, enormously expensive.
Richard Cyganiak thinks its the Semantic Web or Folksonomy : "A bunch of sloppily assigned tags will not be useful for inferencing", but I wonder (hope?) if folksonomies might allow for the emergence of a Semantic Web light, as per August 2009: How Google beat Amazon and Ebay to the Semantic Web. Pity that disallows Google with a strict robots.txt policy.

Read trackback’s, comments and Use Technorati (an indexing site of blogs) against the Boing Boing and Clay Shirky links to expose more commentary on the blogosphere.

Update: the cross post of this on delicious-discuss List has generated someback: the no robots.txt is in place to avoid page rank spamming and save sever load; Joshua Schachter and Clay Shirky are debaiting "what is the semantic web". 4 rounds no knockouts yet.


Please Note that this Blog (False Positives) has moved to


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home